Thursday, December 21, 2006

Judge Jones and the ACLU

A Comparison of Judge Jones’ Opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover with
Plaintiffs’ Proposed “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law”

Judge Jones relied heavily on quotations from the ACLU. The fact that the ACLU has not accused him of plagarism demonstrates that the ACLU allowed Jones to use its comments on ID virtually verbatim. This calls into question the independence of the American Judicial system and is damaging to the ACLU cause again ID.

Just one quote from a paper written by the Discovery Institute.

""" In fact, 90.9% (or 5,458 words) of Judge Jones’ 6,004-word section on intelligent design as science was taken virtually verbatim from the ACLU’s proposed “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” submitted to Judge Jones nearly a month before his ruling. Judge Jones even copied several clearly erroneous factual claims made by the ACLU. The finding that most of Judge Jones’ analysis of intelligent design was apparently not the product of his own original deliberative activity seriously undercuts the credibility of Judge Jones’ examination of the scientific validity of intelligent design. """

Read on>>> http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=1186

Ekklesia tries to undermine Intelligent Design Initiative

Date: 28th November 2006
It is with regret that we report that Ekklesia, who claim to be a Christian ‘think tank’ have worked to undermine an excellent initiative by Truth in Science. Truth in Science sent copies of the DVD Unlocking the Mystery of Life into every secondary school in the country so that school children can consider the evidence for Intelligent Design alongside evolution as allowed by the National Curriculum. However, this initiative has come in for some vigorous criticism by the British Humanist Association (BHA), and from Ekklesia who joined with the BHA to lobby the Government Minister.
Read more >>> http://www.csm.org.uk/news.php?viewmessage=70

The logical fallacies and dangers of Dawkins’ atheism

Originally posted on CSM - Date: 9th November 2006
Richard Dawkins has been promoting his new book The God Delusion with missionary zeal, stating that he wants to convert young people to atheism. But to make his case for atheism Dawkins is guilty of using fallacious logic. So what are the Dawkins’ fallacies that young people should be aware of?
read on >>> http://www.csm.org.uk/news.php?viewmessage=69